From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ranquist v. M&M Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 23, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-387-DBH (D. Me. May. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-387-DBH

05-23-2012

CHRISTIE RANQUIST, PLAINTIFF v. M & M INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 2, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff's counsel, his Recommended Decision on Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Motion for Default Judgment. The defendant had previously defaulted. The time within which to file objections expired on May 21, 2012, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Default Judgment on Counts I and II is GRANTED in the amount of $96,942.82, plus back pay from March 1, 2012, through the date of judgment at the rate of $134.62 weekly and prejudgment interest.

SO ORDERED.

_____________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ranquist v. M&M Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 23, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-387-DBH (D. Me. May. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Ranquist v. M&M Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIE RANQUIST, PLAINTIFF v. M & M INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-387-DBH (D. Me. May. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Barrella v. Vill. of Freeport

rkers, 955 F.2d 831, 833–34 (2d Cir.1992) (noting that because punitive damages are a penalty and not awarded…