Opinion
Argued March 26, 1903
Decided April 9, 1903
Eustace Conway for appellant.
John Larkin for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and VANN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rankine v. Metzger
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1903
66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)
Summaries of
Rankine v. Metzger
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 9, 1903
66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for
Rankine v. Metzger
Case Details
Full title:HAROLD S. RANKINE, Appellant, v . JULIUS I. METZGER, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 9, 1903
Citations
66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)
66 N.E. 1115
Citing Cases
Matter of Phipps
The doctrine of merger is not to be applied "with rigidity" (1 Bogert, op. cit., p. 549), and, where it…