From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RANDY T. MAYO ADC #134578 v. NORRIS

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jan 22, 2010
NO. 5:08cv00313 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 22, 2010)

Opinion

NO. 5:08cv00313 BSM.

January 22, 2010


ORDER


The court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau and the parties' objections. After carefully reviewing the recommended disposition and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, petitioner's claims regarding his parole conditions and the validity of his criminal convictions and sentence are without merit or procedurally barred, and they are dismissed with prejudice. His claims regarding the conditions of his confinement are dismissed without prejudice.

Therefore, judgment shall be entered denying this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

RANDY T. MAYO ADC #134578 v. NORRIS

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Jan 22, 2010
NO. 5:08cv00313 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 22, 2010)
Case details for

RANDY T. MAYO ADC #134578 v. NORRIS

Case Details

Full title:RANDY T. MAYO PETITIONER ADC #134578 v. LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Jan 22, 2010

Citations

NO. 5:08cv00313 BSM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

State v. Tanner

Samson v. California, 547 U.S. at 853, 126 S.Ct. at 2200, 165 L.Ed.2d 250. In order to reduce recidivism, a…