From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 6, 2018
190 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)

Opinion

No. 95575-1

06-06-2018

RANDY REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, v. Kasey HARMON, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 5, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted and review of the issue raised in the answer to the petition for review is also granted. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs within 30 days of the date of this order that address the issue of whether Randy Reynolds & Associates was an aggrieved party in the Court of Appeals under Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.1. The supplemental briefs may also address the other issues raised in the petition for review and the answer to the petition for review.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 6, 2018
190 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)
Case details for

Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon

Case Details

Full title:RANDY REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, v. Kasey HARMON, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 6, 2018

Citations

190 Wn. 2d 1019 (Wash. 2018)
190 Wash. 2d 1019
418 P.3d 802

Citing Cases

Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon

We granted review of all issues and asked for supplemental briefing on whether Reynolds qualified as an…

Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon

We granted review of all issues and asked for supplemental briefing on whether Reynolds qualified as an…