Summary
dismissing a § 1983 complaint against the City of Minneapolis because the plaintiff sued the City “based solely upon the alleged acts or omissions of the City's employees, specifically, the individual officers,” and vicarious liability does not apply to § 1983 claims
Summary of this case from Heggs v. Olmsted Cnty.Opinion
Civ. No. 06-859 (PAM/RLE).
September 5, 2007
ORDER
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, it is —
ORDERED:
That the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 36], is granted.