From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 11, 2019
NO. 09-19-00084-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 09-19-00084-CR

12-11-2019

VERONICA RANDALL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 18-29579

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State indicted Veronica Randall for Felony Theft, a state jail felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(D). On November 26, 2018, Randall pled guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement and true to one enhancement paragraph. On February 11, 2019, after waiving her right to a jury trial, the trial court held a bench hearing and sentenced Randall to one-year confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The trial court certified that this was not a plea-bargain case and Randall had the right of appeal. Randall timely filed a notice of appeal.

The attorney appointed to represent Randall in her appeal filed an Anders brief which asserted that the attorney diligently reviewed the record and found no meritorious claims on which to appeal Randall's sentence and that any appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810-13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel served Randall with a copy of the Anders brief filed on her behalf. This Court notified Randall of her right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for doing so. This Court did not receive a pro se response.

We have independently reviewed the record, and we agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might support an appeal. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (stating that the reviewing court must determine whether arguable grounds for review exist). The Court concludes it is unnecessary for us to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief this appeal. Cf. id. As no arguable grounds exist to support the appeal, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Randall may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.

/s/_________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice Submitted on November 26, 2019
Opinion Delivered December 11, 2019
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Randall v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 11, 2019
NO. 09-19-00084-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Randall v. State

Case Details

Full title:VERONICA RANDALL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Dec 11, 2019

Citations

NO. 09-19-00084-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 11, 2019)