From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Dec 1, 1879
59 N.H. 363 (N.H. 1879)

Opinion

Decided December, 1879.

Common carriers may, by express contract, limit their common-law liability.

ASSUMPSIT, against the defendants, as common carriers of merchandise. Facts found by a referee.

The plaintiff delivered the property in question to the defendants, to be transported from Nashua to Cresco, Iowa, and received a bill of lading which contained the contract between the parties, and in which the defendants excepted from their liability the dangers of fire. The merchandise was destroyed by fire while on the way, without fault of the defendants.

Rolfe, for the plaintiff.

Stevens Parker, for the defendants.


Common carriers may, by express contract, limit their common-law liability. Moses v. B. M. R. R., 24 N.H. 71, 90; York Co. v. Central R. R., 3 Wall. 107; Pemberton Co. v. N. Y. C. R. R., 104 Mass. 144; Grace v. Adams, 100 Mass. 505; Scho. Bailm. 454, and notes. The referee has found that by the contract of the parties the defendant was not to be liable for damage caused by fire, and that the defendant was without fault.

Judgment for the defendant.

FOSTER and ALLEN, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Dec 1, 1879
59 N.H. 363 (N.H. 1879)
Case details for

Rand v. the Merchants' Dispatch Trans. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RAND v. THE MERCHANTS' DISPATCH TRANS. CO

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Dec 1, 1879

Citations

59 N.H. 363 (N.H. 1879)

Citing Cases

Durgin v. Express Co.

Common carriers may limit their common-law liability by express contract against risks not arising from their…