From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 31, 1922
92 So. 94 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

7 Div. 726.

January 31, 1922.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; O.A. Steele, Judge.

John Ramsey was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. Affirmed.

E.O. McCord Son, of Gadsden, for appellant.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

The bill of exceptions should be stricken. Sections 3019 and 3022, Code 1907. In the absence of the bill of exceptions, the court will not review charges refused. 73 So. 748.


The motion of the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause must prevail. The record shows that it was not approved within 90 days from the date it was presented. Sections 3019 and 3020, Code 1907. The appellant was convicted under a complaint which charged him with larceny, and with buying, concealing, receiving, or aiding in concealing stolen property.

There being no bill of exceptions, we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing certain written instructions requested by the defendant. Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 So. 748, 13 Mich. Digest, p. 795. § 712. We have examined the record and find no reversible error.

The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 31, 1922
92 So. 94 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Ramsey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAMSEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jan 31, 1922

Citations

92 So. 94 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)
92 So. 94

Citing Cases

Coleman v. State

The bill of exceptions was presented too late and must be stricken. Pippin v. Perry, 206 Ala. 582, 91 So.…

Beecham v. State

Code 1923, § 6433; Ettore v. State, 214 Ala. 99, 106 So. 508. In absence of a bill of exceptions, the refusal…