From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Sloan-Kentner

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 13, 2009
334 F. App'x 107 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-56169.

Submitted September 14, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 13, 2009.

James Blake Ramsey, Beaumont, CA, pro se.

Paul F. Arentz, Esquire, Pamela J. Holmes, Joel A. Davis, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Pre-siding. D.C. No. 5:07-cv-01096-JSL-SH.

Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


James Blake Ramsey appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations and fraud in connection with an unlawful detainer proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Rhoades v. Avon Prods., Inc., 504 F.3d 1151, 1156 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

Ramsey does not raise any contentions concerning the grounds for dismissal, and we thus deem any such challenge abandoned. See Cook v. Schriro, 538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1033, 173 L.Ed.2d 301 (2009). Ramsey's procedural challenges are unavailing.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Sloan-Kentner

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 13, 2009
334 F. App'x 107 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Ramsey v. Sloan-Kentner

Case Details

Full title:James Blake RAMSEY, aka Blake Ramsey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

334 F. App'x 107 (9th Cir. 2009)