From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 28, 2012
103 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D12–1991.

2012-12-28

Rodolfo RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge. Rodolfo Ramos, Florida City, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge.
Rodolfo Ramos, Florida City, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Rodolfo Ramos (defendant) appeals the order entered by the trial court summarily denying his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the grounds raised in the motion are insufficient, we affirm. However, because it appears on the face of the record that the defendant was designated a habitual felony offender based upon a burglary conviction that would not qualify as a prior conviction since it did not occur before the commission of the current offenses, see State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005), our affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant raising this issue in a subsequent rule 3.800(a) motion. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003) (holding that rule 3.800(a) motions barred as successiveonly if same issue was previously raised).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 28, 2012
103 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rodolfo RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 28, 2012

Citations

103 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)