From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 116 (2017)

Summary

overruling Maynard v. Nygren, 332 F.3d 462, 468 (7th Cir. 2003), which had previously declared the standard to be clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Tomas v. Ill. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

Opinion

No. 16–1418.

10-02-2017

Armando RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. T&H LEMONT, INCORPORATED.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 116 (2017)

overruling Maynard v. Nygren, 332 F.3d 462, 468 (7th Cir. 2003), which had previously declared the standard to be clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Tomas v. Ill. Dep't of Emp't Sec.
Case details for

Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Armando RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. T&H LEMONT, INCORPORATED.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

138 S. Ct. 116 (2017)
199 L. Ed. 2d 31

Citing Cases

Tomas v. Ill. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

In civil cases, the facts underlying a district court's decision to dismiss the suit or enter a default…

Apex Colors, Inc. v. Chemworld Int'l Ltd.

Id. "In civil cases, the facts underlying a district court's decision to dismiss the suit or enter a default…