From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2001
279 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Summary

In Ramirez, the Appellate Division upheld an award of $500,000 for future pain and suffering where “the plaintiff sustained permanent brain damage as a result of an assault upon him by police officers” 719 N.Y.S.2d at 289-90.

Summary of this case from Tardif v. City of New York

Opinion

January 25, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant, the City of New York, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated October 12, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $200,000 for past pain and suffering and $500,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it, and the plaintiff, Rene Ramirez, cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the same judgment as failed to award him damages for lost earnings.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen J. McGrath and Ellen B. Fishman of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Sivin Miller, New York, N.Y. (Edward Sivin and Laurence J. Sass of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The uncontroverted evidence established that the plaintiff sustained permanent brain damage as a result of an assault upon him by police officers. The damages award for past and future pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see, CPLR 5501[c]; Regis v. City of New York, 269 A.D.2d 515).

The court properly dismissed the plaintiff's claim for lost earnings. The plaintiff testified that he worked occasionally as a security guard and was paid "off the books". He further testified that at the time of the assault, he was unemployed and receiving "social security" benefits. This evidence is insufficient to sustain a lost earnings claim (see, Gomez v. City of New York, 260 A.D.2d 598; Papa v. City of New York, 194 A.D.2d 527; Bailey v. Jamaica Buses Co., 210 A.D.2d 192).


Summaries of

Ramirez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2001
279 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

In Ramirez, the Appellate Division upheld an award of $500,000 for future pain and suffering where “the plaintiff sustained permanent brain damage as a result of an assault upon him by police officers” 719 N.Y.S.2d at 289-90.

Summary of this case from Tardif v. City of New York
Case details for

Ramirez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:RENE RAMIREZ, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 289

Citing Cases

Williams v. Pelican Pest Control, Inc.

Furthermore, the damage awards for past pain and suffering do not deviate materially from what would be…

Tardif v. City of New York

Courts have awarded plaintiffs amounts ranging from $500,000 to $3 million for future pain and suffering on…