From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 29, 2022
21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW)

11-29-2022

RAKOWER LAW PLLC, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO BERNER and PRACTIKO, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

ONA T. WANG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has reviewed ECF Nos. 89 and 91. Because Plaintiff did not break down the costs associated with its fees and expenses request, the Court declines to issue sanctions against Defendants at this time. See Korzeniewski v. Sapa Pho Vietnamese Rest. Inc., No. 17-CV-5721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 312149, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, No. 17-CV-05721 (MKB) (SJB), 2019 WL 291145 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2019) (denying motion for attorney's fees where motion was not supported by adequate documentation). The Court reminds the parties that any request to adjourn future conferences before the Court must be made in a timely fashion.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 29, 2022
21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Rakower Law PLLC v. Berner

Case Details

Full title:RAKOWER LAW PLLC, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO BERNER and PRACTIKO, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

21-cv-6439 (PGG) (OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2022)