From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Railroad Company v. Trook

U.S.
Jan 1, 1879
100 U.S. 112 (1879)

Summary

In Railroad Co. v. Trook, 100 U.S. 112, cited for the appellee, as in District of Columbia v. Gannon, 130 U.S. 227, the judgment in special term was for damages in an action sounding in tort, which bore no interest, either by the general law, or by the judgment of affirmance in general term.

Summary of this case from Keller v. Ashford

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1879.

Where a judgment for the recovery of money, affirmed in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, is brought here for re-examination, the amount thereof, without adding interest or costs, determines the value of "the matter in dispute," under the act of Feb. 25, 1879 ( 20 Stat. 320), and, if it does not exceed $2,500, this court has no jurisdiction.

Mr. James G. Payne in support of the motion.

Mr. Enoch Totten, contra.


MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.

Trook, in an action in the court below against the Baltimore and Potomac Railroad Company, recovered judgment, Feb. 19, 1877, for $4,000 and costs of suit. A motion for a new trial was then made on exceptions taken during the progress of the cause, and on account of excessive damages. Trook entered a remittitur of $1,500, and the judgment was ultimately affirmed at a hearing in general term. The company then removed the case here by writ of error, which Trook moves to dismiss, on the ground that this court, under the act of Feb. 25, 1879 ( 20 Stat. 320), has no jurisdiction, as the "matter in dispute exclusive of costs" does not exceed "the value of $2,500."


In cases brought here by writ of error for the re-examination of judgments of affirmance in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, the value of the matter in dispute is determined by the judgment affirmed without adding interest or costs. The judgment in this case, after the $1,500 had been remitted to avoid a new trial, did not exceed $2,500. Such being the case, under the rule established in Railroad Company v. Grant ( 98 U.S. 398), our jurisdiction has been taken away.

The motion to dismiss will be granted, each party to pay his own costs; and it is

So ordered.


Summaries of

Railroad Company v. Trook

U.S.
Jan 1, 1879
100 U.S. 112 (1879)

In Railroad Co. v. Trook, 100 U.S. 112, cited for the appellee, as in District of Columbia v. Gannon, 130 U.S. 227, the judgment in special term was for damages in an action sounding in tort, which bore no interest, either by the general law, or by the judgment of affirmance in general term.

Summary of this case from Keller v. Ashford
Case details for

Railroad Company v. Trook

Case Details

Full title:RAILROAD COMPANY v . TROOK

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1879

Citations

100 U.S. 112 (1879)

Citing Cases

Washington Georgetown R'D v. Harmon

In Keller v. Ashford, 133 U.S. 610, which was a case of contract, the matter in dispute in the District…

N.Y. Elevated Railroad v. Fifth Nat. Bank

Mr. William F. McRae, for the motion. I. The subject-matter involved in this appeal, exclusive of costs, is…