From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raia Industries, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

November 17, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Green, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The proponent of a motion for summary judgment is required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case. The failure to make such a showing requires the denial of the motion, regardless of the insufficiency of the opposing papers (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851; Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132). Here, the plaintiff has failed to make the necessary prima facie showing. Thompson, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raia Industries, Inc. v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Raia Industries, Inc. v. Young

Case Details

Full title:RAIA INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. CHRISTINE A. YOUNG, Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Republic National Bank v. Zito

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is…

Plum v. Long's Auto Body, Inc.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff submitted an affidavit in which he denied that…