From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rackable Systems, Inc. v. Super Micro Computer, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 28, 2007
No. C 05-3561 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)

Summary

distinguishing the Hilgraeve case to cases where other evidence exists besides the copyright date for demonstrating public availability

Summary of this case from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.

Opinion

No. C 05-3561 PJH.

March 28, 2007


ORDER


Notwithstanding the court's admonishment to the parties at the last hearing that they are required to submit unredacted chambers copies of motions and supporting documents, the staff of the undersigned judge is still spending an inordinate amount of time trying to obtain unredacted copies from the parties. Accordingly, the court is compelled to warn the parties that if redacted copies continue to be submitted to chambers, monetary sanctions will be imposed. Additionally, the court will consider imposing a bar to future filings under seal which will obviate the need for redactions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rackable Systems, Inc. v. Super Micro Computer, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 28, 2007
No. C 05-3561 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)

distinguishing the Hilgraeve case to cases where other evidence exists besides the copyright date for demonstrating public availability

Summary of this case from Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
Case details for

Rackable Systems, Inc. v. Super Micro Computer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff(s), v. SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

Citations

No. C 05-3561 PJH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2007)

Citing Cases

Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.

In addition, Dr. Spafford expressly linked the user manual to the ThunderByte 7.0 software on which he…