From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 3, 2011
446 F. App'x 211 (11th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-12023 D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02162-WSD

11-03-2011

RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant - Appellee.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Non-Argument Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

Before EDMONDSON, WILSON, and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This case involves an interpretation of the commercial general liability insurance policies that Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. ("Racetrac") purchased from Ace American Insurance Company ("ACE"). Racetrac was sued by two individuals who claim they suffered personal injuries as a result of exposure to Racetrac's gasoline products. When ACE refused to cover Racetrac for those claims, Racetrac sought a declaratory judgment, claiming that the policies covered their excess liability. The district court found that Racetrac failed to state a claim for declaratory relief upon which relief may be granted and dismissed Racetrac's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The court found that the pollution exclusion clause in the policies precluded coverage. Racetrac now appeals.

After carefully reviewing the record and the district court's order, we conclude that the court properly granted the motion to dismiss. The pollution exclusion provision in the policies expressly excludes coverage for injuries caused by "any substance if such substance has, or is alleged to have, the effect of making the [air] impure, harmful, or dangerous," including the air within a structure. As the district court correctly found, Racetrac seeks coverage for the injured employees' claims that "allege that the gasoline vapor, and specifically the toxic benzene contained in it, made the air they inhaled impure, harmful, and dangerous, which resulted in their claimed physical injuries." Such claims fall squarely within the policies' pollution exclusion.

We also agree with the district court that the pollution exclusion does not violate Georgia public policy since the liability insurance policies at issue are primarily intended to provide Racetrac with coverage for the countless other risks associated with operating convenience stores.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov 3, 2011
446 F. App'x 211 (11th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

446 F. App'x 211 (11th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Goldberg v. National Union Fire Insurance

an v. Am. Reliance Ins. Co. of New Jersey, 549 So.2d 751, 753–54 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1989) (affirming dismissal…