From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rabat v. GNAC Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 1992
180 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 20, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


Plaintiff alleges that she sustained personal injuries when she slipped and fell on a clear liquid substance on the floor of a restroom in defendant's casino. Her pleadings claim actual notice of the condition by reason of the presence of defendant's employees on the premises prior to the accident, and constructive notice of the condition by reason of its duration. After plaintiff filed a note of issue and a statement of readiness representing that all pretrial proceedings had been completed, defendant moved for summary judgment, relying on the pleadings and deposition testimony given by plaintiff and a security officer employed by defendant on the date of the accident and arguing that there was no proof tending to show that defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition. The motion was granted.

It is well settled that proof of notice, either actual or constructive, is essential to recovery by a plaintiff who has fallen as a result of a foreign substance on the floor of a commercial establishment. The plaintiff must present evidence tending to show either that the defendant knew of the dangerous condition and did not remedy it, or that the condition had existed for a sufficient length of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have corrected it or warned of its existence (Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, affd 64 N.Y.2d 670).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing the motion for summary judgment, we find that she has failed to raise a triable issue of fact to support the essential element of actual or constructive notice, there being no evidence that the condition was created by defendant or had existed for a period of time sufficient to afford defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care, an opportunity to discover and correct it (see, Huth v. Allied Maintenance Corp., 143 A.D.2d 634).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Rabat v. GNAC Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 1992
180 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Rabat v. GNAC Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LAURICE RABAT, Appellant, v. GNAC CORP., Also Known as GOLDEN NUGGETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
579 N.Y.S.2d 407

Citing Cases

Smith v. P J Edwards, Inc.

Nor does plaintiff raise an issue of fact as to notice with evidence that the crumbs and icing were an…

Schiano v. TGI Friday's, Inc.

In a slip-and-fall case, a plaintiff must be able to demonstrate that the defendant either created the…