From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raanan v. Fifth Avenue of Long Island Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-09379.

April 11, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), entered September 3, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Kral, Clerkin, Redmond, Ryan, Perry Girvan, Mineola, N.Y. (Anne M. Gremillot of counsel), for appellants.

Mitchel E. Weiss, New York, N.Y. (Elizabeth Mark Meyerson and Randi Siegel of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition, a toothpick, upon which the injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell ( see Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc., 297 AD2d 277). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendants Waldbaum, Inc., and The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., Inc., created the "condition" or had actual or constructive notice thereof ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838; Kraemer v. K-Mart Corp., 226 AD2d 590, 591; Becker v. Waldbaum, Inc., 221 AD2d 396; Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, 210 AD2d 280, 281). The plaintiffs interposed no opposition to that branch of the motion which was made on behalf of the defendant Fifth Avenue of Long Island Realty Associates, an out-of-possession landlord.

Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted.


Summaries of

Raanan v. Fifth Avenue of Long Island Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Raanan v. Fifth Avenue of Long Island Realty

Case Details

Full title:MIRA RAANAN et al., Respondents, v. FIFTH AVENUE OF LONG ISLAND REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 143

Citing Cases

Marino v. Stop Shop Supermarket Company

Thus, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of Kart Kare's motion which was for summary judgment…