From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R. R. v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1913
80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1913)

Opinion

(Filed 10 December, 1913.)

Trials — Appeal and Error.

This action was tried in accordance with the decision in the former appeal, and no reversible error is found.

APPEAL by defendant from Bragaw, J., at May Term, 1913, of MOORE.

Douglass Douglass, Jerome Price, R. L. Burns, and W. H. Lyon for plaintiff.

W. H. Neal for defendant.


This is an action to recover damages, and the facts are fully stated in the former appeal. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.


This action was tried in accordance with the principles laid down in the former appeal, 157 N.C. 369, and upon an examination of the entire record we find no reversible error.

No error.

(396)


Summaries of

R. R. v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1913
80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1913)
Case details for

R. R. v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:ABERDEEN AND ASHBORO RAILROAD COMPANY v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1913

Citations

80 S.E. 1118 (N.C. 1913)
164 N.C. 395

Citing Cases

R. R. v. R. R

New trial. Cited: S. c., 164 N.C. 395.…