From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R. K. C. v. J. M. F.

U.S.
Jun 28, 2010
561 U.S. 1029 (2010)

Summary

holding that the titleholder's statements that he would "take care of" the claimant and "be there for her," and that "what's mine is yours, what's yours is mine," were "insufficient to fulfill the promissory requirement for a constructive trust"

Summary of this case from Jaffer v. Hirji

Opinion

No. 09–10348.

06-28-2010

R.K.C., Father, petitioner, v. J.M.F., Mother.


Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.


Summaries of

R. K. C. v. J. M. F.

U.S.
Jun 28, 2010
561 U.S. 1029 (2010)

holding that the titleholder's statements that he would "take care of" the claimant and "be there for her," and that "what's mine is yours, what's yours is mine," were "insufficient to fulfill the promissory requirement for a constructive trust"

Summary of this case from Jaffer v. Hirji
Case details for

R. K. C. v. J. M. F.

Case Details

Full title:R. K. C. v. J. M. F

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 28, 2010

Citations

561 U.S. 1029 (2010)
130 S. Ct. 3509
177 L. Ed. 2d 1097

Citing Cases

Jaffer v. Hirji

See Bankers Sec. Life Ins. Soc'y, 406 N.E.2d at 441 (holding that statements by the titleholder that he would…