From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quirk v. Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1997
238 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 24, 1997


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered June 13, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendants' brief, denied defendants' cross motion to dismiss plaintiff's first cause of action alleging a discrimination claim under section 8-502 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York for failing to serve a copy of the complaint on the New York City Corporation Counsel and Commission on Human Rights prior to filing, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We adhere to our decision in Bernstein v. 1995 Assocs. ( 217 A.D.2d 512), in which we rejected the contentions made by defendants herein.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Quirk v. Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1997
238 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Quirk v. Sherry

Case Details

Full title:LORI QUIRK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY SHERRY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Teller v. America West Airlines, Inc.

Assuming, without deciding, that the relation back of the plaintiff's Administrative Code claim to the date…

Klein v. London Star Ltd.

Rather, the Appellate Division characterized § 8-502(c) as "a device by which the City Commission . . . and…