From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quirino v. Quirino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 11, 1984
459 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-1396.

December 11, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Francis X. Knuck, Judge.

Friedman Miller and Lawrence Friedman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Martin D. Kahn and Patricia E. Kahn, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.


Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award of custody of the oldest child to the father, we affirm. Grant v. Corbitt, 95 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1957); § 61.13, Fla. Stat. (1983).

Affirmed.


The only record justification for separating the two minor boys was the older child's expressed preference, made under compulsion to elect. I would reverse. See Arons v. Arons, 94 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1957) (children should not be separated from each other except for the most compelling cause).


Summaries of

Quirino v. Quirino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 11, 1984
459 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Quirino v. Quirino

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA QUIRINO, APPELLANT, v. FRANK QUIRINO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 11, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Young v. Hector

An appellate court must affirm if there is substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's…