From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quintana v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 2, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv359/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05cv359/LAC/EMT.

May 2, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 30, 2006. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1).

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Quintana v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 2, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv359/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Quintana v. Bauknecht

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO QUINTANA, Petitioner, v. DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05cv359/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 2, 2006)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Vazquez

The remaining cases cited by Respondent do not actually address the specific criteria at issue in the case…

SCOTT v. FCI FAIRTON

As the DSM-IV, in turn, dictates that diagnosis is dependent upon the existence of certain symptoms during a…