From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quigley v. Verizon Wireless

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
No. C-11-6212 EMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. C-11-6212 EMC

02-03-2012

RODNEY J. QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Docket No. 27)

Plaintiff Rodney J. Quigley has moved for a default judgment against two of the defendants in this case, more specifically, Waste Management, Inc. and Receivable Management Services Corp. Because the Clerk of the Court has declined Mr. Quigley's request for entry of default as to these defendants, see Docket No. 32 (notice), the Court denies Mr. Quigley's motion for default judgment against the same defendants without prejudice. See Vongrabe v. Sprint PCS, 312 F. Supp. 2d 1313, 1318 (S.D. Cal. 2004) (stating that "a plain reading of Rule 55 demonstrates that entry of default by the clerk is a prerequisite to an entry of default judgment").

This order disposes of Docket No. 27.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Quigley v. Verizon Wireless

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
No. C-11-6212 EMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Quigley v. Verizon Wireless

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY J. QUIGLEY, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

No. C-11-6212 EMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)