From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quigley Co., Inc., v. Asbestos Limited, Inc.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)

Opinion

Decided September 14th, 1944.

On appeal from an order of the Court of Chancery.

Mr. George L. Burton, for the respondent.

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, for the appellants.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported at 134 N.J. Eq. 312. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Quigley Co., Inc., v. Asbestos Limited, Inc.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 14, 1944
39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)
Case details for

Quigley Co., Inc., v. Asbestos Limited, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., respondent, v. ASBESTOS LIMITED, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 14, 1944

Citations

39 A.2d 135 (N.J. 1944)
39 A.2d 135

Citing Cases

Litton Industrial Systems, Inc. v. Kennedy Van Saun Corp.

r it had discontinued its business in New York, and its president had been served in New Jersey. There the…

Gore v. United States Steel Corp.

" The New Jersey cases on the subject suggest an approach similar to that taken in the cited authorities. See…