From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

QUALITY INF v. RO-WEST

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Oct 12, 2006
No. 14-06-00740-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2006)

Opinion

No. 14-06-00740-CV

Memorandum Opinion filed October 12, 2006.

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 838842.

Dismissed.

Panel consists of Justices ANDERSON, HUDSON, and GUZMAN.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed May 4, 2006. A motion for new trial was filed on June 2, 2006. The record reflects that, while the trial court retained plenary power, it granted the motion for new trial on July 18, 2006. The record also reflects that the trial court subsequently denied the same motion for new trial on July 20, 2006. The July 20, 2006, order denying the motion for new trial effectively vacated the July 18, 2006, order granting the motion for new trial.

A trial court retains plenary power to vacate or Aungrant@ an order granting a new trial for seventy-five days after the original judgment is signed. Porter v. Vick, 888 S.W.2d 789, 790 (Tex. 1994). The July 20, 2006, order was signed seventy-seven days after the date the judgment was signed. An order vacating an order granting a new trial that is signed outside the court's period of plenary power is void. Id. Because the July 20, 2006, order, denying the motion for new trial, was signed outside the trial court's plenary power, it is void.

The case remains at the status existing at the time of the signing of the July 18, 2006, order granting a new trial and setting aside the judgment of May 4, 2006. Because there is no appealable final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction.

On September 19, 2006, this court issued a letter to the parties, notifying them of the possible jurisdictional problem and directing the parties to file responses on or before September 29, 2006. Appellant has not filed a response. Appellee filed a response on September 25, 2006, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

QUALITY INF v. RO-WEST

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Oct 12, 2006
No. 14-06-00740-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2006)
Case details for

QUALITY INF v. RO-WEST

Case Details

Full title:QUALITY INFUSION CARE, INC., Appellant, v. RO-WEST TRUST, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Oct 12, 2006

Citations

No. 14-06-00740-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2006)

Citing Cases

In re Baylor Medical Center

, 77 S.W.3d 331, 334-35 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, mand. denied); In re Steiger, 55 S.W.3d 168,…