From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pumphrey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Dec 1, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-06509 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-06509

12-01-2015

WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On May 20, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a pro-se Complaint (Document 1) in this matter. Subsequently, on November 2, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 8). By Standing Order (Document 2) entered on May 21, 2015, this matter was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On November 5, 2015, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 9) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, dismiss the civil action as moot, and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by November 23, 2015, and none were timely filed.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 8) be DENIED, that this civil action be DISMISSED AS MOOT, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: December 1, 2015

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Pumphrey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Dec 1, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-06509 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Pumphrey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-06509 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 2015)

Citing Cases

Whitmore v. W. Reg'l Jail

When considering a similar case, where an inmate alleged his constitutional rights had been infringed by the…

Holbrook v. Aldridge

When considering a similar case, where an inmate alleged his constitutional rights had been infringed by the…