From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pulse Engineering, Inc. v. Mascon, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. California
Mar 11, 2009
Civil No. 08cv0595 JM (AJB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2009)

Summary

correcting "output" to read "input" and "first" to read "third" where these were the only possible replacement terms evident from the face of the patent

Summary of this case from Adaptix, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Opinion

Civil No. 08cv0595 JM (AJB).

March 11, 2009


ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE


By stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the telephonic Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 16, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. is continued to March 24, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pulse Engineering, Inc. v. Mascon, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. California
Mar 11, 2009
Civil No. 08cv0595 JM (AJB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2009)

correcting "output" to read "input" and "first" to read "third" where these were the only possible replacement terms evident from the face of the patent

Summary of this case from Adaptix, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Case details for

Pulse Engineering, Inc. v. Mascon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PULSE ENGINEERING, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. MASCON…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Mar 11, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08cv0595 JM (AJB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Pelican Int'l v. Hobie Cat Co.

” Pulse Eng'g, Inc. v. Mascon, Inc., No. 08CV0595 JM (AJB), 2009 WL 755321, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Mar.…

Arigna Tech. v. Nissan Motor Co.

In this context, interposed circuit elements could fundamentally change the characteristics of the circuit…