From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pugh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 25, 2007
954 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D07-651.

April 25, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-10324 CFA02.

Woodrow D. Pugh, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Appellant, Woodrow Pugh, appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, in which he challenged his sentence as being misapplied by the Department of Corrections. The Department of Corrections applied Pugh's sentences consecutively, while the trial court ordered them to be applied concurrently. We affirm the order under review, without prejudice to Pugh's ability to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the Leon County circuit court after he fully exhausts his administrative remedies. The record is silent as to whether Pugh has yet exhausted his administrative remedies. King v. State, 665 So.2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

See Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1213-14 (Fla. 2006).

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pugh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 25, 2007
954 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Pugh v. State

Case Details

Full title:Woodrow D. PUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 25, 2007

Citations

954 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Phillips v. State

If the Department has refused to follow a sentencing order awarding him this credit, Phillips must first…

Cunningham v. State

The judge's letter to DOC was a nullity and it had no legal affect on appellant's sentence. The letter was…