From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Public Works Sup. Co. v. Eveready Machinery Co.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 26, 1987
525 A.2d 988 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)

Opinion

(4924)

Submitted on briefs April 27, 1987

Decision released May 26, 1987

Action to recover damages for breach of contract, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at New Britain and referred to Hon. Roman J. Lexton, state trial referee; judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

Gregory J. Pepe filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).

Peter J. Zagorsky filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).


In this case, the defendant is attacking the factual findings of the trial court and the legal conclusions drawn from those facts. The defendant is asking us to retry this case. We cannot. On appeal, the function of this court is limited solely to the determination of whether the factual findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous or whether the decision is otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book 4061 (formerly 3060P); Damora v. Christ-Janer, 184 Conn. 109, 113, 441 A.2d 61 (1981); Ram Roofing Sheet Metal Co. v. A.B.C. Plumbing Heating, Inc., 2 Conn. App. 54, 56, 475 A.2d 341 (1984). It is the province of the trial court to pass upon the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded the evidence. Essex Savings Bank v. Leeker, 2 Conn. App. 98, 102, 476 A.2d 1071 (1984); Edgewood Construction Co. v. West Haven Redevelopment Agency, 170 Conn. 271, 272, 365 A.2d 819 (1976). This court cannot find facts or draw conclusions from primary facts found, but can only review such findings to determine whether they could legally, logically and reasonably be found and whether the trial court could thereby conclude as it did. Appliances, Inc. v. Yost, 186 Conn. 673, 676-77, 443 A.2d 486 (1982); Hallmark of Farmington v. Roy, 1 Conn. App. 278, 280-81, 471 A.2d 651 (1984).

Our review of the record and the briefs, with particular attention to the trial court's exhaustive and carefully drawn memorandum of decision, indicates that the factual findings of the court are fully supported by the evidence and its legal conclusions are legally and logically sound.


Summaries of

Public Works Sup. Co. v. Eveready Machinery Co.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 26, 1987
525 A.2d 988 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
Case details for

Public Works Sup. Co. v. Eveready Machinery Co.

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. v. EVEREADY MACHINERY COMPANY

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 26, 1987

Citations

525 A.2d 988 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
525 A.2d 988

Citing Cases

State v. Reagan

Ordinarily it is not the function of this court or the Appellate Court to make factual findings, but rather…

State v. Garcia

We cannot retry the case. Public Works Supply Co. v. Eveready Machinery Co., 11 Conn. App. 79, 525 A.2d 988…