From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 23, 1984
678 S.W.2d 76 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 1051-83.

May 23, 1984.

Appeal from Criminal District, Court No. 3, Dallas County; James B. Zimmerman, Judge.

James W. Lee, III, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., and Molly Meredith, Jeffrey Hines and Ruth E. Plagenhoef, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted of forgery by passing. In an unpublished opinion the Court of Appeals affirmed. The cause is before this Court to determine the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs of the respective parties and the opinion of the Court of Appeals and have determined that the decision of the Court of Appeals is correct. The appellant's petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Pruitt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
May 23, 1984
678 S.W.2d 76 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)
Case details for

Pruitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Patricia Ann PRUITT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: May 23, 1984

Citations

678 S.W.2d 76 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Cockerham v. State

The State's petition for discretionary review is therefore dismissed as improvidently granted, pursuant to…