From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Jan 14, 2009
NO. 1:08cv00060 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 14, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 1:08cv00060 SWW.

January 14, 2009


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau and the objections filed in response, and has further reviewed the relevant record de novo. In his objections, plaintiff states that defendants carried out their threat and he received a major disciplinary and spent ten days in isolation. Thus plaintiff contends defendants did not merely threaten but in fact retaliated against him.

The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings. Plaintiff fails to allege facts that establish the violation of a constitutionally protected right.

Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this complaint in its entirety, without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order adopting the recommendations, and any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith. Further, this dismissal counts as a "strike" as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pruitt v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Jan 14, 2009
NO. 1:08cv00060 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Pruitt v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PRUITT ADC #132782 PLAINTIFF v. CHANCE NORRIS, et al DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division

Date published: Jan 14, 2009

Citations

NO. 1:08cv00060 SWW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Poplar Bluff Trust Co. v. Bates

(3) Under the decree setting aside the deed of trust on the property in question and specifically subjecting…

Lortz v. Rose

(5) The record title and actual occupancy are very important in determining whether a sheriff is wrong in not…