From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prudential Insurance Co. of Am. v. Wilkerson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1964
327 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20555.

February 19, 1964.

George Stelljes, Jr., Francis P. Conroy, Harry T. Gray, and Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy Gibbs, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

Tom B. Stewart, Jr., and Evans, Stewart Proctor, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.


Prudential has appealed from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict awarding Mrs. Wilkerson damages for personal injuries in a diversity suit.

A review of the record leads us to the conclusion that there was substantial evidence that Prudential had knowledge that rain water was being carried from the sidewalks and streets into a building owned and controlled by Prudential on the shoes and apparel of many persons entering the building and failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent a terrazzo floor in such building from becoming wet, slick, and dangerous from water deposited thereon (see Karen Gardens, Inc. v. Walen, Fla., 71 So.2d 732); and that the dangerous condition caused Mrs. Wilkerson to slip and fall on the floor, resulting in the personal injuries and damages for which she was awarded recovery.

We are of the opinion the court properly refused to instruct the jury that the amount of the recovery was not subject to federal or state income taxes and that the trial in other respects was free from prejudicial error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Prudential Insurance Co. of Am. v. Wilkerson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1964
327 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Prudential Insurance Co. of Am. v. Wilkerson

Case Details

Full title:The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. Leola…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1964

Citations

327 F.2d 997 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Canal Barge Co. v. Griffith

This circuit also holds that a trial judge commits no error in refusing to instruct the jury that lump sum…

Laird v. Hudson Engineering Corporation

"By the Court: Whether there was or was not." I am aware that this Circuit has held that the trial judge is…