Opinion
No. 3D19-1879
01-02-2020
Edduard PRINCE, Appellant, v. Raymond GONZALEZ and American Shuttle, Inc., Appellees.
Edduard Prince, in proper person. Michael A. Pancier, P.A., and Michael A. Pancier (Pembroke Pines), for appellees.
Edduard Prince, in proper person.
Michael A. Pancier, P.A., and Michael A. Pancier (Pembroke Pines), for appellees.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. v. Wetherald, 885 So. 2d 900, 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (recognizing that the arbitration "exemption provided in [ 9 U.S.C.] § 1 [is] limited to the types of workers enumerated in the provision (transportation workers), and [is] further limited to transportation workers engaged in the actual movement of goods in interstate commerce"); Donmoor, Inc. v. Sturtevant, 449 So. 2d 869, 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (concluding that a worker must be "involved in, or closely related to, the actual movement of goods in interstate commerce" for the arbitration exemption set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 1 to apply).