From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pride v. C.A.T. Development

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 12, 1999
4 S.W.3d 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75850

Filed: October 12, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Patrick Clifford, Judge.

Casserly Jones, St. Louis, for appellant.

Samantha Harris, Columbia, for respondent.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Appellants Farrel Pride ("Pride") and Burlington Northern Commercial Properties, Inc. ("BNCP") appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of Respondents C.A.T. Development, L.P., Rick Thompson, and Barbara Thompson (collectively referred to as "C.A.T."). Pride and BNCP claim that their motion showed good cause for the default and demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pride v. C.A.T. Development

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 12, 1999
4 S.W.3d 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Pride v. C.A.T. Development

Case Details

Full title:FARREL PRIDE AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 12, 1999

Citations

4 S.W.3d 595 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Public Services Commission v. Panda-Brandywine

That proposal was submitted to the PSC as part of an overall settlement agreement, and, by order entered…