From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2019
Criminal Case Number 15-20472 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2019)

Opinion

Criminal Case Number 15-20472 Civil Case Number 17-11365

08-13-2019

TYRONE PRICE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER TRANSFERRING SECOND MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

On April 27 and August 7, 2017, petitioner Tyrone Price filed a motion and an amended motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On December 13, 2018, the Court issued an opinion and judgment denying the motions. On February 22, 2019, long after the time for doing so had expired, Price filed an untimely notice of appeal. He subsequently filed a motion for relief from the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, and he late filed a second motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because the present motion is the second attempt by the petitioner to mount a collateral attack on his sentence via 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Court must transfer the case to the court of appeals for a determination whether the petitioner may file a successive motion. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h), 2244(b)(3)(A).

An individual seeking to file a second or successive motion under section 2255 must first ask the court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the petition. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h), 2244(b)(3)(A); Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637, 641 (1998). Congress has vested in the court of appeals a screening function that the district court would have performed otherwise. Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996). When a defendant files a second or successive motion to vacate his sentence in the district court without preauthorization from the court of appeals, the district court must transfer the motion papers to the court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (directing that "[w]henever a civil action is filed in a court . . . and that court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action . . . to any other such court in which the action . . . could have been brought at the time it was filed"); In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997) (holding that "when a prisoner has sought § 2244(b)(3) permission from the district court, or when a second or successive petition for habeas corpus relief or § 2255 motion is filed in the district court without § 2244(b)(3) authorization from this court, the district court shall transfer the document to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631."). The petitioner cannot proceed with his present motion without first obtaining permission to file a second or successive motion to vacate or correct sentence from the court of appeals. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is ordered to transfer the motion papers to the court of appeals pursuant to In re Sims and 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER the petitioner's second motion to vacate his sentence (ECF No. 419) to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Date: August 13, 2019

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 13, 2019.

s/Susan K. Pinkowski

SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Price v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2019
Criminal Case Number 15-20472 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Price v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE PRICE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2019

Citations

Criminal Case Number 15-20472 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2019)