From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Price v. Booth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1964
21 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

May 11, 1964


In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 23, 1963, which granted the motion of the defendant Martin for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and which dismissed the complaint and directed cancellation of the lis pendens. It appears without dispute that, during the interim between the service of the notice of appeal herein on or about October 26, 1963 and the submission of the appeal to this court for decision on April 27, 1964, the plaintiff-appellant died. In the absence of the substitution of his executor or administrator as the proper party plaintiff-appellant, this court may not proceed to a determination of the appeal on the merits (CPLR 1015, 1021; Bronheim v. Kelleher, 258 App. Div. 972). Under the circumstances, the appeal will be held in abeyance for a period of 90 days after entry of the order hereon; and if, during this period, an executor or administrator for the plaintiff-appellant shall not have been appointed and substituted as the proper party in this action, the appeal will be dismissed (CPLR 1021). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Price v. Booth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1964
21 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Price v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS PRICE, Appellant, v. HAROLD H. BOOTH et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Wisdom v. Wisdom

07; Siegel, N Y Prac § 184). Thus, in Matter of O'Esau v. Bliss Co. ( 224 N.Y. 701), where the State…

Schweers v. Schweers

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered August 6, 1970, denying plaintiffs-appellants' motion…