Summary
declining to "find conflict" between the reports of a medical expert and relevant medical records because doing so "would require medical knowledge which neither the plaintiff, her attorney, nor the court possesses"
Summary of this case from Allen-Ward v. BerryhillOpinion
CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-321-DBH
10-21-2014
ANNE MARIE PRESTON, PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 1, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision.
The time within which to file objections expired on October 20, 2014, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE