From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Press, Inc. v. Donahue

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1966
221 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio 1966)

Opinion

No. 40206

Decided November 9, 1966.

Taxation — Sales and use tax — Equipment not used in production of property for sale — Equipment used in production and distribution, when — Appeal from Board of Tax Appeals — Court will not consider question not raised before board, when.

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals.

The appellant, The Wesleyan University Press, Inc., is engaged in the business of producing and distributing classroom publications which are directed to and sold for use in elementary and secondary schools. It also publishes and distributes large quantities of promotional material. All manufacturing, i.e., printing, preparing for shipment and mailing of these periodicals and promotional material, is conducted in appellant's plant in Ohio.

The Tax Commissioner issued a sales and use tax assessment against appellant, based on an audit of its records. The Board of Tax Appeals, on appeal, modified and, as modified, affirmed the order.

An appeal from the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals brings the cause to this court for review.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour Peace, Mr. Charles D. Minor, Messrs. Lee, Toomey Kent and Mr. John M. Skilling, for appellant.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. Edgar L. Lindley, for appellee.


This appeal involves electronic data processing equipment and supplies used in connection therewith. This equipment produces magnetic tapes used in the distribution of appellant's publications and promotional material. The tapes contain customer addresses, label information and statistical information, perform certain payroll functions, and, after being processed, are removed from the equipment. The Board of Tax Appeals found that this equipment plays no direct part in the manufacturing or in the wrapping or packaging of appellant's product, and that the rental or purchase of same should not be excepted from the sales and use taxes.

The tapes, after being removed from such equipment, are placed in another class of equipment and control the production of rolls of mailing and shipping labels which are directly attached to mailing wrappers and contain subscriber information, such as names, addresses, periodicals, quantity, issues and account numbers. Other equipment in this class is used exclusively for promotion and advertising and directly addresses customers' products for shipment. The Board of Tax Appeals found that this class of equipment is used directly in the production and shipping process of appellant's product, and that the rental and purchase thereof should be excepted from the sales and use taxes.

Appellant's second assignment of error that the so-called "use-on-use" exception created by the amendment of Section 5739.02, Revised Code, effective January 2, 1962, should have been applied was not raised before the Board of Tax Appeals and will not be considered here.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals not being unreasonable or unlawful is hereby affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, WHITE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

WHITE, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for SCHNEIDER, J.


Summaries of

Press, Inc. v. Donahue

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1966
221 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio 1966)
Case details for

Press, Inc. v. Donahue

Case Details

Full title:THE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY PRESS, INC., APPELLANT v. DONAHUE, TAX COMMR.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 9, 1966

Citations

221 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio 1966)
221 N.E.2d 590

Citing Cases

R.R. Donnelley Sons Co. v. Porterfield

See Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. Porterfield (1972), 30 Ohio St.2d 163, at page 174. The application of R.C.…

Plastic Tooling Aids Laboratory, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue Services

Ct. 1985); compilations of plant information and instructions; Commonwealth v. Kuhlman Corporation, 564…