From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Presley v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1977
57 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

May 31, 1977


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 11, 1977, which denied appellant's motion to withdraw as attorney for the defendant on the ground that the latter's insurance company had disclaimed coverage. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff payable by appellant. An attorney cannot use a motion to withdraw as a means of determining the validity of an insurance company's disclaimer (Brothers v Burt, 27 N.Y.2d 905). However, Special Term was premature in determining that the insurance company was estopped from disclaiming liability. The appropriate vehicle to resolve that issue is a declaratory judgment action. Martuscello, J.P., Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Presley v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1977
57 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Presley v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PRESLEY, Respondent, v. CECIL WILLIAMS, Respondent, and PERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Rusolo v. Odyssey

Order affirmed, with costs. A motion to withdraw as counsel is an inappropriate means of testing the…

Monaghan v. Meade

We disagree with Special Term's determination. In moving for a judicially approved withdrawal in this case,…