From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1996
226 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 23, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bernard McCaffrey, J.).


Recent precedent squarely holds that "`preclusion of the insurance company's ability to deny the claim is the appropriate remedy'" where, as here, the insurance company neither denies a claim within 30 days after receiving it nor seeks to extend that time by requesting verification in the prescribed forms ( Presbyterian Hosp. v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 210 A.D.2d 210, 211 [2d Dept], quoting Loudermilk v. Atlanta Ins. Co., 178 A.D.2d 897, 898 [3d Dept]; see also, St. Clare's Hosp. v. Allcity Ins. Co., 201 A.D.2d 718, 720 [2d Dept]). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly granted ( cf., Matter of Doyle v Amster, 79 N.Y.2d 592, 595).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1996
226 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty

Case Details

Full title:PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, as Assignee of KAREN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 266

Citing Cases

Central Gen. Hosp. v. Chubb Group of Ins. Cos.

We agree. Contrary to Chubb's contentions, the Supreme Court correctly determined that preclusion of the…