Summary
declining to include language advising potential plaintiffs of possible obligation to answer interrogatories, be deposed, or testify because "individual discovery is rarely appropriate in FLSA collective actions"
Summary of this case from Wingo v. Martin Transp., Inc.Opinion
CASE NO. 3:06-cv-07776-EMC.
January 24, 2007
(Proposed) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Walter V. Siebert, an active member in good standing of the bar of the Supreme Court of Colorado and the United States District Court for the District of Colorado whose business address and telephone number are Sherman Howard L.L.C., 633 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3000, Denver, CO 80202, (303) 299-8222, having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Fund for Public Interest Research, Inc.,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No, 45, Electronic Case Filing.