From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Premium Bond Corporation v. City of Long Beach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1936
249 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

December 15, 1936.


Order granting the respondent's motion for a temporary injunction restraining the city of Long Beach and its officers from interfering with the plaintiff in its use of premises situated in the city of Long Beach as a building for five apartments for use of five families, and from prosecuting any claim of violation of the zoning law with regard thereto, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the city of Long Beach is not estopped from enforcing the provisions of the zoning ordinance because of any acts or conduct on the part of any of its administrative officers. The adoption of a zoning ordinance is a governmental function. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Premium Bond Corporation v. City of Long Beach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1936
249 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Premium Bond Corporation v. City of Long Beach

Case Details

Full title:PREMIUM BOND CORPORATION, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF LONG BEACH and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Reichenbach v. Windward

The majority of jurisdictions have adapted the principles of estoppel to zoning and many have evolved a…

Corning v. Town of Ontario

py said trailer to live in as it contained less than 900 square feet and that a criminal proceeding has been…