From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Precision Dynamics v. Tax Comm. of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1982
437 N.E.2d 273 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided May 13, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARGARET M.J. MANGAN, J.

Donald N. David for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Robert S. Katz of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The determination of market value essentially is a question of fact ( Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496, 510). The Appellate Division considered all the elements which "go into the makeup of value" and, on this record, it cannot be said that its determination is erroneous as a matter of law. Indeed, any legal error that may have been made by the trial court in considering co-operative conversion potential as the sole indicator of value was corrected by the Appellate Division which accorded such potential little, if any, weight in its determination of valuation. We note that the newly enacted section 581 of the Real Property Tax Law, foreclosing consideration of conversion potential, is inapplicable to the present proceeding.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Precision Dynamics v. Tax Comm. of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 13, 1982
437 N.E.2d 273 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Precision Dynamics v. Tax Comm. of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:PRECISION DYNAMICS CORP., Appellant, v. TAX COMMISSION OF CITY OF NEW…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 13, 1982

Citations

437 N.E.2d 273 (N.Y. 1982)
437 N.E.2d 273
452 N.Y.S.2d 14

Citing Cases

South Bay v. Bd. of Assessors

Thus, to a limited extent a discounted gross sell-out type approach did, at one time, have appellate…