From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pratt v. Sirmons

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 20, 2006
No. CIV-04-1070-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-04-1070-F.

November 20, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a prisoner appearing pro se, has filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. [Doc. No. 49]. Although 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) does not apply to habeas actions, see United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737 (10th Cir. 1997) (holding Prison Litigation Reform Act inapplicable to habeas and § 2255 actions and appeals) overruled on other grounds in U.S. v. Hurst, 322 F.3d 1256 (10th Cir. 2003), both § 1915(a)(1) and (a)(3) do apply to a habeas appeal. Accordingly, a petitioner must show that the appeal is taken in good faith and that he lacks the financial ability to pay the required fees. See, McIntosh v. United States Parole Comm'n, 115 F.3d 809, 812 (10th Cir. 1997).

Having reviewed the motion and the record, the Court finds that Petitioner has presented a reasoned, non-frivolous argument on appeal and that the appeal is taken in good faith. Accordingly, the Court finds Petitioner is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis without pre-payment of all fees, and this motion is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pratt v. Sirmons

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 20, 2006
No. CIV-04-1070-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Pratt v. Sirmons

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM RAY PRATT, Petitioner, v. MARTY SIRMONS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 20, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-04-1070-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 20, 2006)