From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prater v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 17, 1969
224 So. 2d 679 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

4 Div. 691.

June 17, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dale County, Mike Sollie, III, J.

Farmer Farmer, Dothan, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Marlin Mooneyham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Prater was indicted and convicted of falsely pretending to Paul Brown with intent to defraud that he owned an inventor's patent, etc. The trial judge fixed his punishment at three years imprisonment.

The State over objection which was overruled, introduced an uncertified copy of letters patent. The heading noted Prater as "assignor to P. A. B. B. Incorporated, Meridian, Miss."

In its uncertified form this document was hearsay. Code 1940, T. 7, § 432 provides in pertinent part:

"As an additional or alternative mode of proof, the following documents may be proven as follows: * * *

"9. Documents in the departments of the United States government, by the certificate of the legal custodian thereof."

The admission of this document was prejudicial and requires a reversal of the judgment of conviction. We forego consideration of how the State can prove as of the period November 11-December 2, 1964 (the span of time covered by Brown's payments to Prater) that the letters patent (if certified) were still under assignment to a person other than Prater.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause is there remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Prater v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 17, 1969
224 So. 2d 679 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Prater v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles E. PRATER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 17, 1969

Citations

224 So. 2d 679 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
224 So. 2d 679

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

A fingerprint record, on file with the federal bureau of investigation, which had been forwarded to a…

Luckie v. State

Young v. State, 47 Ala. App. 674, 260 So.2d 406; Hall v. State, 49 Ala. App. 695, 275 So.2d 374. Hearsay is…