From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Power v. Tallant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 12, 1976
224 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

51598.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 6, 1976.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 12, 1976.

Trover. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Wright.

H. S. Mahan, for appellees.


Appellant's brief contains a mere recital of the existence of a single error without argument or citation of authority. The single enumeration is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 ( 191 S.E.2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 ( 192 S.E.2d 374); Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) ( 206 S.E.2d 585); O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga. App. 134 ( 207 S.E.2d 641). There being no matter for consideration by this court, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 6, 1976 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 12, 1976.


Summaries of

Power v. Tallant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 12, 1976
224 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Power v. Tallant

Case Details

Full title:POWER et al. v. TALLANT et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 12, 1976

Citations

224 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
224 S.E.2d 534

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Cotton States c. Ins. Co.

Although counsel repeats the enumeration, mere repetition of an enumeration does not amount to argument.…

Summerfield v. Decinque

Therefore, these enumerations are deemed to have been abandoned. Cochran v. Baxter, 142 Ga. App. 546, 547 (…