From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc. v. Marche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1985
110 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 29, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Di Paola, J., Becker, J.).


Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the amount of damages awarded from the principal sum of $139,512.71 to the principal sum of $133,315.64. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

Plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.

In this action to recover damages in connection inter alia, with defendant Louis La Marche's alleged renting or leasing of eight gasoline stations from plaintiffs, plaintiffs failed to prove the amount of rent owed on the Francis Lewis Boulevard station ( cf. Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher, 52 N.Y.2d 105; Reisler v. 60 Gramercy Park N. Corp., 88 A.D.2d 312, 317). Nor did plaintiffs adequately prove an amount to which they might be entitled for reasonable use and occupancy of the premises. Hence, the amount awarded as rent for the Francis Lewis Boulevard station, i.e., $5,162.93, must be stricken. Similarly, plaintiffs failed to establish defendant Louis La Marche's liability for maintenance charges sought in connection with the Francis Lewis Boulevard station ($976.31), and the Long Island City station ($57.83). Consequently, the judgment should also be reduced by the amounts recovered for maintenance at these two stations. Defendant Louis La Marche's remaining arguments have been reviewed and have been found to lack merit.

With respect to defendant Celeste La Marche's appeal, the trial court correctly noted that it was unnecessary to resettle the judgment to provide that an order of attachment against her property be annulled. Pursuant to CPLR 6224, the order of attachment against defendant Celeste La Marche's property was annulled upon the entry of judgment in her favor. Finally, under the circumstances, the determination that costs or disbursements should not be awarded to defendant Celeste La Marche (CPLR 8101) was appropriate. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc. v. Marche

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1985
110 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc. v. Marche

Case Details

Full title:POWER TEST PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. LOUIS LA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Marini v. Lombardo

The value of use and occupancy is the net value that would have been received by the landlord, taking into…

255 Butler Assocs., LLC v. 255 Butler, LLC

. " ‘[A]n occupant's duty to pay the landlord for its use and occupancy of the premises is predicated upon…