From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powell v. Wall

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1895
23 S.E. 322 (N.C. 1895)

Opinion

(September Term, 1895.)

Tax List — Taxes Due Sheriff — Attachment.

(For syllabus see Davie v. Blackburn, ante.)

MOTION to dissolve warrant of attachment, heard before Bryan, J., at chambers at Winston, pursuant to order to show cause, etc., made at Spring Term, 1895, of STOKES.

The material facts are the same as stated in Davie v. Blackburn, ante, 383. The motion was allowed and plaintiff Durham Fertilizer Co. appealed.

A. M. Stack and Jones Patterson for Durham Fertilizer Company.

Walter W. King, Glenn Manly and Watson Buxton for defendants.


The plaintiff had attachments issued and levied upon the tax books for the years 1891-'92 in the hands of J. C. Wall, former Sheriff of Stokes County. On motion of the defendant Wall the attachments were vacated by Bryan, J., on the ground that the tax books were not subject of levy by attachment, and the plaintiff appealed.

There is no error in the ruling of his Honor. The same question has been before the Court in Davie v. Blackburn, ante, 383, and the reasons for our decision in this case are set out in that one. There were several questions of practice raised in the case, but it is unnecessary to discuss them, as the plaintiff's action has failed on its merits.

No error. (388)


Summaries of

Powell v. Wall

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1895
23 S.E. 322 (N.C. 1895)
Case details for

Powell v. Wall

Case Details

Full title:POWELL, GIBBS CO. ET AL. v. J. C. WALL ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1895

Citations

23 S.E. 322 (N.C. 1895)
117 N.C. 387

Citing Cases

Todd v. Mackie

This practice was adopted to discourage `sham pleas.' Here there is no `sham plea' in the case." Ward v.…

State v. Wilcox

Diagrams, plats, and the like are of frequent use for this purpose in the trial of causes, and for such…